New York's College Tuition Plan Faces Blowback

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo proudly touted the free tuition program for some middle-income students passed in the state budget last week, staging a celebratory rally with former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in Queens.

But just a few days later, as people took a closer look at the fine print of the Excelsior Scholarship program, the criticism started to roll in.

One provision requires students who accept the tuition to live in New York for four years after graduation — or pay the money back.

This residency rule prompted New York Times columnist David Brooks to call the plan the “worst public policy idea of the year," because he argued it could reduce a graduate’s lifetime earnings if they are prevented for several years from taking a more lucrative job in another state.

A New York Times editorial also critiqued the plan.

An editorial by the Albany Times Union called the requirement “indentured citizenship” and said the residency requirement should be scrapped in favor of doing more to build up better paying jobs in upstate New York and more affordable housing downstate so that college graduates would have more incentives to remain in the state.

According to a SUNY spokeswoman, 83 percent of public college graduates remain in the state after they receive their degree, so the potential number of students affected by the residency requirement would be small.

But Cuomo dismissed the criticism when asked about it at the annual Easter Egg Hunt on Saturday; he took a swipe at The New York Times instead. 

“I haven’t seen an editorial endorsement in the Times that actually represented what happened in an election in a long time,” Cuomo said, accusing The New York Times of being against politicians in the Cuomo family.
 
“If you were to read the Times editorial, my father wouldn’t be governor, I wouldn’t be governor once, let alone re-elected,” Cuomo said.
 
The New York Times endorsed both Cuomo and his father, Mario Cuomo, for governor during their multiple election campaigns.
 
EJ McMahon, a former government official who is now with the fiscal watchdog group The Empire Center, said he didn't believe it was wrong to require a residency commitment in exchange for the tuition. Instead, he said, there were larger problems with the plan, including income requirements, that were not well conceived. 
 
“Of all the important changes in public policy we’ve seen enacted in New York, perhaps in living memory, this one is the most significant change to have received virtually no serious study or debate,” McMahon said. “And that’s really saying something, given the way Albany operates.”
 
McMahon said it seemed as though Cuomo got the idea for free tuition, then worked backwards.
 
“This has all the earmarks of something that was simply reverse engineered from the headline the governor wanted to see,” McMahon said.
 
The state’s Higher Education Services Corporation is working out the rules for the program in the coming weeks.